register page graphic

Found: Louey Leong Hock

By Anna Wolf (Chinese Australian Family Historians of Victoria)


In May 2019, walking past the Chinese Museum in Little Bourke Street on my way to a yum cha with my husband’s family, I was thinking that I had not been to the museum for a long time. So when I got home, I looked up the museum’s website to see what was currently on exhibition. I saw the information about CAFHOV’s Victorian CEDT Index transcription project and promptly registered my interest.

My parents were from Toisan (台山) in what was called Canton (now Guangdong province). My father came to Australia directly from China in 1949, my mother and I came from Hong Kong in 1960. Both my parents passed away in 2012. From brief mentions and snippets of stories told at family gatherings, I had always believed that my father came to Melbourne to work for an uncle in a shop called ‘On Hie’ (安泰, pronounced ‘On Hie in Toisan dialect and ‘On Tai’ in Cantonese) in Chinatown. I did not know the name of this uncle and did not enquire much about my father’s life here.

I have always been interested in family history and had just finished working on a project on my father-in-law’s German Jewish family, as well as helping a friend with her research of her family roots in Devon in the United Kingdom. I had thought it fairly difficult, if not impossible, to find out information about my Chinese side of the family. Firstly, due to my poor knowledge of reading and writing Chinese (my Chinese education stopped at primary grade 2), and also not knowing even where to start.

The day I spent at the Chinese Museum learning about transcribing the index changed everything. I didn’t find information about my family straight away, but using the Index after the transcribing was completed, I found my great grandfather! I had found a copy of the family tree from my father’s things, and just out of curiosity, I translated my great grandfather’s name, 雷良學, into English (phonetically) and looked it up. And there it was. On page 153 of the register for 1933, entry no.5 – ‘Louey Leong Hock’, and better yet, in brackets ‘Louey Kay’!


Louey Leong Hock (Louey Kay) 1933 entry. Note that the return details in the register have not been completed.

Index entry for Louey Leong Hock (Louey Kay), 1933, Register 2, p. 153, Victorian CEDT Index, https://cafhov.com/vic-cedt-index/?type=id&search=11670 (original data taken from ‘Register of Certificates Exempting from the Dictation Test, 1915-1933’, National Archives of Australia: B6003, 2)

His alias, Louey Kay, would have been this – 雷記. The character 記 is actually pronounced “Gey” (in both dialects). It is usually the last character in a shop name, like company or brand. It is also a sort of a nickname used by close friends to denote that person is the boss of the shop. ‘Louey Kay’ is therefore the name used for my great grandfather by his friends and business associates.

From this entry’s information, I was able to trace his movements and discovered he came to Australia in 1899 and left in 1933. He was 61 when he left, and he died in China in 1934. I am fortunate that one of my Louey cousins is in Guangzhou and he is interested in family history. Through the magic of language translation apps, I have been able to communicate with him to a degree and to confirm some facts and approximate times. And through CAFHOV members, I have received advice about how to search for further records using the services of the Public Records Office of Victoria (PROV) and the National Archives of Australia (NAA).

It was getting my great grandfather’s folder of CEDT documents from the NAA in my hands that was the eureka moment. I was able for the first time to see a photo of my great grandfather, and to share this precious find with my cousins who have never seen him before. Even my father’s oldest living brother was surprised. I guess photography was a rare thing in rural China in the early 1900s, and my uncles and aunts were too young, or not even born when he went back to China that last time.

Louey Leong Hock’s CEDT certificate
[NAA: B13, 1933/638]

The contents of the documents have enabled me to do further research about my great grandfather. Knowing his alias, ‘Louey Kay’, from the Index, I have discovered he travelled back to China three times before his last trip. He worked and lived for a time in Bendigo and Melbourne.

Through information gathered from my cousin, as well as PROV and Trove, I believe he was involved in a Chinese herbal medicine business in Little Bourke Street called ‘Quong Tsy Hong’ (廣善堂) in the early 1900s, and then in a shop in Bendigo called ‘On Loong’. From about 1915, he worked as a storekeeper at ‘On Hie’ at 210 Little Bourke Street. This was the business that I believe was part-owned by my great grandfather and his direct cousin Louey Fee Hock. This must have been the ‘uncle’ from the family stories I’d heard.

This is about as far as I have got in my research before COVID hit us. I need to get in touch with some old-timers in Bendigo and Melbourne’s Chinatown in order to find out more about these shops and the people who owned or worked in them. And of course, it would be helpful to go to my father’s old village to see the family home. But it has been a very interesting journey so far.

register page graphic

Studio photographs and the Vic CEDT Registers: Lucy and Leslie Quon Kee and the Vincent Kelly photograph collection

From the last decades in the nineteenth century local photographic studios began opening across Victoria in country towns and Melbourne suburbs. Photographic technology had developed to a point that it was now within the reach of many. Some of the collections of these photographic studios have survived in the form of glass plate negatives – often labelled the name of the purchaser or subject.

Commercial photographer, Vincent William Kelly, ran photographic studios in various locations in Bendigo, Victoria, from 1904 to 1958 and was also associated with Bartlett Brothers Photographers, Bendigo between 1936 and 1938 and also Moonee Ponds in 1904. A collection of over 1,000 glass plate negatives of his were gifted to the State Library of Victoria by the Rosenberg family.

Tucked within collections, like the Kelly collection, are distinctive portraits of Chinese Australians – posed full frontal and in profile – the poses required for a Certificate Exempting from Dictation Test (CEDT).

Lucy Quon Kee, 1919. Photographer: Kelly, Vincent W.
Note the photographer’s mark indicating which negative was not to be used.
[State Library of Victoria, H2019.83/182]
Lucy’s son, Leslie Quon Kee, 1919. Photographer: Kelly, Vincent W.
Note the photographer’s mark indicating which negative was not to be used.
[State Library of Victoria, H2019.83/184]
Lucy and her son Leslie Quon Kee, 1919. Photographer: Kelly, Vincent W.
Taken in profile these portraits make it clear that these portraits are to be used for identification purposes.
[State Library of Victoria, H2019.83/183]

A search of the Victorian CEDT Registers finds an entry for their travel in 1919.

Lucy and Leslie Quon Kee’s CEDT applications as listed in the Victorian CEDT Index
[Index entry for Lucy and Leslie Quon Kee, 1919, Register 2, p. 43, Victorian CEDT Index, http://www.cafhov.com/vic-cedt-index/?type=id&search=7189 and http://www.cafhov.com/vic-cedt-index/?type=id&search=7188 (original data taken from ‘Register of Certificates Exempting from the Dictation Test, 1915-1933’, NAA: B6003, 2)]

The Registers record them leaving on the Eastern and Lucy returning to Sydney in 1940 on the Tanda but no record of Leslie returning. With a bit of archival digging we discover that he too also returned to Australia.

On the right hand page of the register we can see that Lucy and Leslie left on the 7 October 1919 on the Eastern and that Lucy returned to Sydney on 21 December 1940 on the Tanda. There is no record of Leslie returning.

While there is no link to a file in the B13 Series held at the NAA (see more about this here) and also no results if we manually search the B13 series for the C&E numbers written in the Registers there are quite a few relevant results if we search for ‘Quon Kee’. From these files we learn a lot more about Leslie and the Quon Kee family and also find Leslie’s 1919 CEDT application in a later Department of Immigration correspondence series.

The crossed out numbers in black and the overwritten numbers in red on the right hand side of the page are C&E file numbers which can be used to search for the relevant file in the B13 series.

Also included on the file are copies of the photographic portraits of Leslie taken by the Vincent W. Kelly Studio in Bendigo. Leslie was attending the Violet Street school in Bendigo.

Two of the six photographs provided by Leslie Quon Kee to authorities. The other four would have been attached to two CEDTs, one held by Leslie and the other by Customs to be used for matching on Leslie’s return to Australia.
[NAA: A446, 1963/41986]

From the file we learn that Lesley was born in Melbourne on 22 February 1906 but adopted by Mrs Lucy Quon Kee not long after he was born. She was planning to take him to ‘China’ to be ‘educated and the Chinese language’. The reported intention was to stay for three years and then return.

Lesley Quon Kee was born Edwin James to Selina Whiteacre and an unidentified father in Carlton, 1906
[Victorian births, deaths and marriages, 1716/1906]

Because Leslie was a ‘child of European race or extraction’ and not under the ‘care or charge of some adult person of European race or extraction’, under the Emigration Act 1910 he needed special permission to leave Australia. Inquiries were made as to why he was travelling, the nature of his relationship with Mrs Quon Kee and the character of his adopted father (who was deceased). Once this information was provided permission was granted for the two of them to leave in October 1919.

Lucy and Leslie’s final destination was actually Hong Kong. In 1928 Leslie’s adopted sister, Mrs Maud Guy (nee Quon Kee) of Binnaway in New South Wales, wrote to customs officials asking for the return of Leslie’s birth certificate. Leslie was working as a clerk at a firm of solicitors in Hong Kong and needed to prove he was a British subject in order to become an articled clerk.

Nine years later, in 1937, when Leslie wrote to officials he was working for the British War Office. He wanted to know whether, as a ‘natural born Australian subject’ whether he would be able to return to Australia after being away for several years, would there be any objects if an Chinese born wife came with him and what would the status of any children be. He was advised that it was ‘within the power of the Department’ to deny him readmittance due to the fact that he had been ‘domiciled’ in Hong Kong and that it was ‘contrary to the established policy of the Commonwealth Government to admit persons of Asiatic race for permanent residence’.

In 1940 Lucy returned to Sydney and spent the last few years of her life with her daughter Maud before passing way aged 73 in her daughter’s home.

CEDT Lucy Quon Kee had to purchase in order to return to Australia in December 1940
[NAA: ST84/1 1940/559/31-40]

By 1952 Leslie was keen to return to the country of his birth with his wife and children. In his letter requesting permission to return with his family it is clear he had lived a full life in Hong Kong. At some point he had changed his surname to Channing and in 1927 married Lucy, who was born in China. Together they had four children, Gordon, Conrad, Vera and Ruby. In his appeal to authorities he was keen to demonstrate his loyalty to the British Empire by detailing his participation in the Hong Kong Volunteer Defence Corps and the Royal Indian Army Service Corps where he served in a ‘confidential capacity’. During the Japanese occupation he was forced to flee to Macao where he again tried to serve in the war effort. After the Japanese surrender in 1945 he was recalled to Hong Kong to serve in the Royal Indian Army Service Corps. In 1948 when the Corp was repatriated back to India he became Sports Editor of the China Mail.

After investigations into his business interests as an Australian-born subject Leslie was permitted to return and his wife Lucy and youngest daughter Ruby was permitted to arrive on a five year exemption. His eldest three children were initially refused entry.

Leslie obtained an Australian passport in 1952 and toured Australia with a Hong Kong soccer team as their coach in 1953. He was also planning to establish a branch office of Woe Yue Company, a Hong Kong import-export firm in Australia.

[Sydney Morning Herald, 19 August 1953, p.13, via http://www.nla.gov.au/nla.news-article18383740]

After considerable back and forth, misunderstandings and a several interventions on their behalf, including the Australian Government Trade Commissioner in Hong Kong, permission was obtained for the whole family to come to Australia. The older children were allowed entry ‘subject to compliance with normal immigration requirements as to health and character and on the understanding that should any of the children become married to non-Europeans before arrival in Australia, such marriage will give no claim to the entry of their non-European spouses’.

Secretary of the Department of Immigration reporting back to the Australian Government Trade Commissioner on the status of the Channing case, 1954
[NAA: A446, 1963/41986]

Gordon and Conrad arrived in 1955 on British Passports issued in Hong Kong with visas for permanent residence. Lucy, Vera and Ruby landed in Sydney in January 1957, delayed by evidence of tuberculosis in the lungs of Lucy and Vera.

Leslie and Lucy ended up settling and living out the rest of their lives in Canberra where Leslie worked as a court reporter for the Canberra Times. They still have descendants living in Australia.

Lucy and Ruby Channing, taken in Hong Kong mid-1950s
[NAA: A446, 1963/41986]

Further information

McKinnon, Leigh, A biographical dictionary of historic figures in Bendigo’s Chinese Community, Golden Dragon Museum, 2015